Communications, Electronics and Sensing Systems logo

Articles

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026)

Low Power Sensor Design and Coordination Latency for Battery Lifetime in Environmental Monitoring Stations

Submitted
May 8, 2026
Published
May 21, 2026

Abstract

The operational efficacy of remote environmental monitoring stations is fundamentally constrained by the longevity of their power sources. Because these stations are typically deployed in inaccessible geographical regions, frequent battery replacement is economically and logistically unfeasible. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of how battery lifetime is determined by the intersection of low power sensor design and coordination latency within multi-node networks. By dissecting the micro-architectural choices in sensor node hardware, such as microcontroller sleep states, analog front-end power gating, and transceiver selection, this study illuminates the baseline energy consumption profiles of individual monitoring units. Furthermore, the research investigates the profound impact of coordination latency, defined as the time delay and energy overhead incurred when decentralized nodes synchronize, exchange data, and return to quiescent states. Through extensive theoretical modeling and empirical simulation, it is demonstrated that inefficiencies in network coordination often negate the benefits of ultra-low power hardware components. Prolonged active states caused by idle listening, clock drift synchronization delays, and packet collisions are identified as primary culprits for premature battery depletion. The findings propose a unified framework that balances hardware-level power optimizations with latency-aware medium access control protocols, offering actionable guidelines for maximizing the deployment lifespan of environmental sensor networks.

References

  1. 1. Ancion, Z., Borrell-Damián, L., Mounier, P., Rooryck, J., & Saenen, B. (2022). Action plan for diamond open access. Zenodo.
  2. 2. Becerril, A., Bosman, J., Bjørnshauge, L., Frantsvåg, J. E., Kramer, B., Langlais, P.-C., Mounier, P., Proudman, V., Redhead, C., & Torny, D. (2021). OA diamond journals study. Part 2: Recommendations. Zenodo.
  3. 3. Biel, L. (2023). JoSTrans: 20 years of diamond open access publishing in translation and interpreting studies. Journal of Specialised Translation, 40, 1–8.
  4. 4. Rother, E. T. (2007). Systematic literature review X narrative review. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 20, v–vi.
  5. 5. Bruns, A., Lenke, C., Schmidt, C., & Taubert, N. C. (2020). ISSN-matching of gold OA journals (ISSN-GOLD-OA) 4.0. Available online: https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2944717 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
  6. 6. Bruns, A., Taubert, N., Cakir, Y., Kaya, S., & Beidaghi, S. (2022). Diamond open access journals Germany (DOAG). Available online: https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2963331 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
  7. 7. Védrine, L.; Le Gallo, J. Does EU Cohesion Policy Affect Territorial Inequalities and Regional Development? HAL: Tokyo, Japan, 2021.
  8. 8. Caravale, A. (2025). Diamond open access and research infrastructures: The involvement of ⟪archeologia E Calcolatori⟫ in the H2iosc project. Archeologia E Calcolatori, 36(1), 435–442.
  9. 9. Creaser, C., Fry, J., Greenwood, H., Oppenheim, C., Probets, S., Spezi, V., & White, S. (2010). Authors’ awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(Suppl. S1), 145–161.
  10. 10. Dacos, M. (2011). OpenEdition freemium. La Lettre du Collège de France, 31, 56–67.
  11. 11. Ren, F. Preference and willingness to pay for inclusive childcare service of parenting families. Popul. Econ. 2023, 1, 57–70.
  12. 12. Dellmann, S., van Edig, X., Rücknagel, J., & Schmeja, S. (2022). Facetten eines Missverständnisses: Ein Debattenbeitrag zum Begriff “diamond open access”. o-bib. Das Offene Bibliotheksjournal, 9(3), 1–12.
  13. 13. Druelinger, D., & Ma, L. (2023). Missing a golden opportunity? An analysis of publication trends by income level in the directory of open access journals 1987–2020. Learned Publishing, 36(3), 348–358.
  14. 14. Frantsvåg, J. E. (2022). Diamond open access in Norway 2017–2020. Publications, 10(1), 13.
  15. 15. Guennoun, A., Bensaadi, K., Simard, M.-A., Schwartz, R., Murad, L., Leveridge, M., Siemens, R., Larivière, V., & Bhojani, N. (2024). PD60-01 open access publishing in urology: A survey of authors, readers, and editorial boards knowledge, impressions, and satisfaction. The Journal of Urology, 211, e1273.
  16. 16. Jahn, N., & Tullney, M. (2016). A study of institutional spending on open access publication fees in Germany. PeerJ, 4, e2323.
  17. 17. Mrša, V. (2022). Decreasing costs of dissemination of research results by publishing in diamond open access journals. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 60(1), 2–3.
  18. 18. Pilatti, L. E., Pilatti, L. A., de Carvalho, G. D. G., & de Resende, L. M. M. (2025). From fees to free: Comparing APC-based and diamond open access journals in engineering. Publications, 13(2), 16.
  19. 19. Ptakova, M. (2024). Diamond open access as a fair pathway to interdisciplinary archaeological science. Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica-Natural Sciences in Archaeology, 15(2), 127–129.
  20. 20. Saenen, B., Ancion, Z., Borrell-Damián, L., Mounier, P., Oliva Uribe, D., Papp-Le Roy, N., & Rooryck, J. (2024). 2nd diamond access conference report. Zenodo.
  21. 21. Lin, M.; Wang, Q. Center-based childcare expansion and grandparents’ employment and well-being. Soc. Sci. Med. 2019, 240, 112547.
  22. 22. Serrano-Vicente, R., Melero, R., & Abadal, E. (2016). Open access awareness and perceptions in an institutional landscape. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 595–603.