Object Recognition with Radar Signal Features in Autonomous Driving Scenes

Authors

  • Leo Chi-Wai Wan Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China Author

Keywords:

Autonomous Driving, Radar Signal Processing, Object Recognition, Network Simulation, Radar Signal Features

Abstract

The integration of advanced sensor suites is fundamentally critical to the safe and reliable operation of autonomous vehicles in complex dynamic environments. Among the various sensing modalities, automotive radar systems provide unparalleled robustness against adverse weather and lighting conditions. However, the sparsity and noise inherent in radar signals pose significant challenges for high-fidelity object recognition compared to high-resolution optical and laser-based sensors. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the relationship between granular radar signal features and the efficacy of object recognition algorithms, utilizing extensive network simulations modeled after real-world autonomous driving scenarios. By isolating specific signal characteristics such as radar cross-section, micro-Doppler signatures, and range-azimuth profiles, we evaluate their individual and synergistic impacts on the classification accuracy of deep neural networks. The research methodology relies on a high-fidelity synthetic environment to generate annotated radar datasets across a variety of traffic configurations and environmental states. Through rigorous evaluation, the study identifies the optimal combinations of signal features that maximize recognition precision while minimizing computational overhead. The findings provide critical insights into the design of next-generation perception architectures, demonstrating that simulated environments can effectively bridge the data scarcity gap in radar-based deep learning. These results carry significant implications for the development of resilient, all-weather autonomous driving systems.

References

1. Liu, C.; Zhao, J.; Li, J.; Wang, D.; Yu, F.R. UAV Aided Integrated Sensing, Communication and Computing: Optimization via Federated Learning. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2025, 75, 6045–6058.

2. Braess, D.; Nagurney, A.; Wakolbinger, T. On a paradox of traffic planning. Transp. Sci. 2005, 39, 446–450.

3. Braess, D. Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung. Unternehmensforschung 1968, 12, 258–268.

4. Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Jia, L.; Wu, Q.; Anpalagan, A. Anti-Jamming Communications Using Spectrum Waterfall: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2018, 22, 998–1001.

5. Chen, X.; Ding, H.; Ma, Y.; Li, X.; An, J.; Fang, Y. A Dual-Tier Policy-Oriented Anti-Jamming Scheme Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2026, 25, 10652–10668.

6. Taubert, N., Bruns, A., Lenke, C., & Stone, G. (2021). Waiving article processing charges for least developed countries. A brick stone of a large-scale open access transformation. UKSG Insights, 34(1), 1.

7. Roughgarden, T.; Tardos, É. How bad is selfish routing? J. ACM 2002, 49, 236–259.

8. Pandya, S.; Srivastava, G.; Jhaveri, R.; Babu, M.R.; Bhattacharya, S.; Maddikunta, P.K.R.; Mastorakis, S.; Piran, M.J.; Gadekallu, T.R. Federated Learning for Smart Cities: A Comprehensive Survey. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 55, 102987.

9. Silva, P.; Teles, F.; Ferreira, J. Intermunicipal cooperation: The quest for governance capacity? Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2018, 84, 619–638.

10. Han, S.; Dastani, M.; Wang, S. Sparse Communication in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning. Neurocomputing 2025, 625, 129344.

11. Zhu, T.; Shi, X.; Xu, X.; Gui, J.; Cao, J. HyperComm: Hypergraph-Based Communication in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. Neural Netw. 2024, 178, 106432.

12. Feng, Z.; Huang, M.; Wu, Y.; Wu, D.; Cao, J.; Korovin, I.; Gorbachev, S.; Gorbacheva, N. Approximating Nash Equilibrium for Anti-UAV Jamming Markov Game Using a Novel Event-Triggered Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. Neural Netw. 2023, 161, 330–342.

13. Matolak, D.W. Channel modelling for vehicle-to-vehicle communications. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2008, 46, 76–83.

14. Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. University of Texas at Austin.

15. Ben-Elia, E.; Shiftan, Y. Which road do I take? A learning-based approach to route choice. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2010, 44, 110–120.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

Issue

Section

Articles